Del_CtrlnoAlt
Del_CtrlnoAlt's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,035
Trade rep: 100%
Del_CtrlnoAlt Jul 3rd, 09, 07:55 PM #7 (permalink)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rozshu View Post
Thanks guys for your reply



Your point that I bold on does make me agree it would be an option not a standard. Thanks Can we use 2.5" type for system like HTPC?

It is a fact on the power consumption part. Will a RAID setup consume more power than a single Raptor? I am thinking as people starts gradually increasing their storage capacity either internally or externally, the power consumption part would still inevitably increase in the end.

Implementation. Agree. I took about 2hrs just to setup a RAID 0. Luckily, there are solution now like Asus Drive Xpert. But as for data loss, be it single or RAID still mad like hell.

******

I often feel that harddisk had always been neglected that is the slowest part in a pc configuration. Until I get to know RAID. Most latest motherboards in the market now could support a RAID setup as well as other dual-purpose setups. So can we call these as standard features? I can understand the purpose is customization.

What puzzle me is why stop at having 1 harddisk? Why not make RAID an opt-out option. Most suggestions given to improve a pc system are CPUs, VGA cards, RAM and PSUs. Very little attention is given to harddisk.

Let say a pc system that is build using entry-level parts. By adding another harddisk and RAID 0 it, the user will experience better system performance. It's like adding another stick of ram. It may be only a entry-level pc configuration but with a difference.

I think solutions like RAID and dual-channel memory should be a primary standard of a sales package.
well, i'm thinking of another idea, y don't manufacturers of hdd make everything built into 1 3.5"

imagine you have say 5 platter, each platter is each hdd, then you make it run Raid 5, and on the PCB its already a Raid 5 configuration. so your output will be maxed out... issue is the bandwidth...

so imagine if the mirroring is done internally since there is no need for it to go thru the board or chip, hence that part is done on the pcb, and only 2/3 sata ports needed to be linked to the system. maybe even 1 thats maybe able to provide higher bandwidth.

(ya, all in theory...)