Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    集中精神, 闭关修行 booest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    108,442

    Arstechnica : Intel says no to Windows Vista



    History repeats itself: Intel chooses XP over Vista
    By Emil Protalinski | Published: June 26, 2008 - 04:59PM CT

    The New York Times is reporting that, according to an anonymous tipster close to Intel, the chip giant has decided against upgrading its computers to Windows Vista, and is instead clinging to Windows XP. The company, which employs about 80,000, made the decision after a lengthy analysis by its internal technology staff of the potential benefits of moving to Vista. It found none. At first glance, it would seem that Intel might be following in GM's footsteps and is considering "bypassing Vista," but after taking a closer look, this is not explicitly said. Intel is testing and deploying Vista in certain departments but it has not stated whether it is dismissing Vista altogether or if it is simply holding off a bit longer.

    It might come as a shock to some that this has happened before and may be no big deal. Microsoft blogger Ed Bott did a little digging and found that back in 2002, the same 80,000 employee-strong company announced it would be holding on to Windows 2000 a bit longer, instead of moving over to the superior XP. Many believe that business adoption of XP was very quick, but this is simply a myth. It is difficult to say whether Vista is doing better or worse than XP did for businesses; the sales numbers aren't terrible, but this means nothing when it comes to corporations and their decisions for upgrading.

    When the majority of businesses do eventually ditch XP, Windows 7 will already be available. Currently, Microsoft recommends upgrading to Vista before moving to Windows 7, but it's unlikely the company will be saying the same in 2010. If testing goes well and hardware and application compatibility problems do not plague Windows 7, adoption rates may go through the roof given that the upcoming OS is expected to have the same requirements as Vista. Either way, it's not as big of a deal as many make it out to be; many big corporations have deals with Microsoft where they regularly pay the software giant the same amount, regardless of whether they are currently using the latest OS or its predecessor.
    Life is a Gift, Never take it forgranted
    | i5ooest:i5-4690S cooledby Kozuti | Maximus VII Impact mini-ITX | 2 x 8GB DDR3 | Extreme PRO 480Gb |
    | 1TB Veloci | MX800 | M12 II-620W | Jonsbo W1 |2707WFP (16:10) |

  2. #2
    Moderator BaLtO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,575
    XP is a good choice.

  3. #3
    Foreign Member Paul_Yeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Sengkang
    Posts
    3,063
    When is Win7 going to launch? 2009?

  4. #4
    resistance is futile. simplyadvanced's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,843
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul_Yeo View Post
    When is Win7 going to launch? 2009?
    take whatever m$ says and add 2 years
    .

  5. #5
    spitting mad MrBungle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    575
    Quote Originally Posted by booest View Post
    Microsoft recommends upgrading to Vista before moving to Windows 7
    classic.

    Intel Q9400 @ 3.2 * 2x2 GB G.Skill DDR3 1333 * Gigabyte X48T DQ6 * Radeon 5870
    2x500 GB RAID-0 + 2x320 GB RAID-0 * CM Cosmos S *
    21,193 3DMark06 (old score)

  6. #6
    Registered User HideX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,575
    mycocksoft
    Desktop: AMD Athlon X2 5000+ BE @ 3.2ghz 1.39v | Biostar T-Force 7050-M2 | 4GB Crucial Ballistix DDR-800 | MSI 8800GTS G92 @ 750/1911/1050 | WinXP Pro SP3
    Laptop: Compaq Presario v3136tu | Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 @ 1.66ghz | 2GB Kingston DDR-667 | Intel GMA 950 | WinXP Pro SP3

    Display: LG 226WTQ 22" | Sound: Creative Audigy 2 ZS w/ Klipsch Promedia 2.1 (Customized Canare)
    Internal Storage: 500GB WD 3.5" Sata2 | 80GB Samsung 2.5" Sata2 | External Storage: 1TB Caviar Black 3.5" w/ Vantec Nexstar
    PSU: AeroCool Horsepower 750w Modular | Casing: CM CAV-T01 Cavalier 1 | ODD: Pioneer DVR-216BK Sata
    Input Devices: Logitech Internet Pro | Logitech G1 w/ Razer eXactMat | ISP: Singnet 10mbps Down: 11.68 / Up: 0.79 / Ping: 22ms Local


  7. #7
    -=LAN 'O' Wii=- dr_disciple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    大巴窑
    Posts
    23,667
    viagra sir?

    Quote Originally Posted by HideX View Post
    mycocksoft

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    422
    Quote Originally Posted by simplyadvanced View Post
    take whatever m$ says and add 2 years
    epic

  9. #9
    Moderator BaLtO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,575
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul_Yeo View Post
    When is Win7 going to launch? 2009?
    Microsoft VP says it will probably launch near to Jan 2010, might be early a bit or later a bit.

    So if you have Win XP, can still enjoy now

    So if you have Vista, you don't have much time to enjoy

    Since Windows 7 is the "upgraded vista", people might choose to wait for that or perhaps not since it's vista related.

    Still waiting for Windows 8 news

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    191
    haha mycocksoft windom virga

  11. #11
    Call Lightning Storm kyouta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    20,534
    that's a pretty bad blow to MS

  12. #12
    Registered User haylui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,934
    i thought Intel was negotiated with Microsoft to issue Vista compatible logo to Intel's lower end integrated video chipset. And now Intel denied to use it for their internal computers. What a joke.

    Microsoft should not have issued the logo for the lower end chipset for the sake of getting larger market share. This act is just hurting Microsoft when scandal break out.
    my rig: it isn't an oil rig. how i wish it was.

  13. #13
    crouchety old man
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    129
    Plenty of companies are not moving to Vista simply because it offers them nothing over XP. Not to mention they're not going to buy new computers (if their hardware is your old Pentium IV with 512MB RAM) just to support a change in operating system.

    As always, Microsoft's biggest competitor is themselves.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    749
    Well, vista just looks better than xp for no good. It won't increase the efficiency of a company's employees thus is not worth upgrading to.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    226
    cost-effectiveness is key to adoption...not just looks...
    For business....if the os can fulfilled it's role as a business unit....it has no big need for higher adoption

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast