Switch to Linear ModeSwitch to Hybrid ModeSwitch to Threaded Mode
Printer Friendly View | Email this page | Register Now to enjoy user benefits! | Share on Share on Facebook
newzhunter
newzhunter's Avatar
Registered User


Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,455
Trade rep: 0 (0%)
ASUS EAH3850 Trinity specs and benchmarks newzhunter Mar 27th, 08, 05:36 PM #1 (permalink)
Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Sooner than expected, we've been served some more information about the prototype triple-core card from ASUS. Radeon HD 3850 Trinity will sport three RV670 cores, all on separate MXM modules. Last we reported we did not know the exact specifications of the card, but those have been unveiled today. The core clock is 668MHz and each core has 512MB GDDR3 memory running at 1656MHz, that's a total of 1536MB (and 960 unified shaders if you want to get technical).

Click the image to open in full size.

3DMark 03: 94,110 points

Click the image to open in full size.

3DMark 06: 24,909 points


Kinc has served us with some benchmarks with the card, using an air cooled system and the card overclocked to the maximum setting in Catalyst Control Center, 769/1053MHz, he managed to achieve some quite impressive scores. The results in 3DMark 03 has to be one of the highest single card scores we've seen, if not the highest. He used a system based on the ASUS Rampage Formula X48 with an Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 overclocked to 4.6 GHz (11x419).

http://www.nordichardware.com/news,7559.html

Advertisement:


sg.png
Last edited by newzhunter; Mar 27th, 08 at 05:42 PM..
Niceone
Niceone's Avatar
Registered User


Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,436
Trade rep: 0 (0%)
Niceone Mar 27th, 08, 06:05 PM #2 (permalink)
Original news were bogus.. this has 512MB usable vram which makes much more sense. With that memory this gets similar scores in 3dMark06 than 9800 GX2 (which means that in games it will lose).
----

If this card arrives then it's up to price. That card is way too expensive in current form and would be more expensive than 9800 GX2. This would at least need air cooler in order to fight pricewise. Problem is that this kind of card would consume much more than HD3870 X2 which already has the highest powerconsumption of current gen cards.
fi.png
PhiBer
PhiBer's Avatar
Registered User


Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tampines, Fortune Centre, SLS
Posts: 6,459
Trade rep: 83 (98%)
PhiBer Mar 27th, 08, 06:06 PM #3 (permalink)
OMG.. new hoot! Will it be cheaper than 3870x2?
CPU: Intel Q9550 w/ Noctua U12P + 2 x NH-P12s
M/B: ASUS Rampage Formula
Ram: GSkill 2x2GB PC-1000 GBPQs
HDD: 2 x WD 6400AAKS, 1 x Seagate 7200.11 500, 1 x WD 500AAKS
GFX: XFX 9800GTX
AUD: Creative XtremeMusic (LME49860 + BlackGate!), AudioEngine A5W
OPT: Pioneer DVR-115BK
CAS: Soldam Windy ZR3000 Silver, fully Noctuarized
PSU: Zalman ZM850-HP
LCD: Dell 2707WFP
INP: KBTalking White on White Cherry MX Soft, Razer "Cypher" DA on IceMat White
Toys: PS3 White, PSP Slim White, Vantec HDD Dock White, iPhone
NeT: DGL-4500


Freelance C#/VB/Java/C++/.Net/etc Progamming Services!
sg.png
Niceone
Niceone's Avatar
Registered User


Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,436
Trade rep: 0 (0%)
Niceone Mar 27th, 08, 06:09 PM #4 (permalink)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhiBer View Post
OMG.. new hoot! Will it be cheaper than 3870x2?
Erhm.. This card has 3xRV670 when 3870X2 has 2xRV670. This card has 3x512MB vram, 3870X2 has 2x512MB vram.

This card has heavy water cooling solution, HD3870X2 has simple air cooling solution

This card has actually four PCBs, HD3870X2 has only one.

Think.
fi.png
halocast
halocast's Avatar
Registered User


Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 565
Trade rep: 0 (0%)
halocast Mar 27th, 08, 06:47 PM #5 (permalink)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niceone View Post
Erhm.. This card has 3xRV670 when 3870X2 has 2xRV670. This card has 3x512MB vram, 3870X2 has 2x512MB vram.

This card has heavy water cooling solution, HD3870X2 has simple air cooling solution

This card has actually four PCBs, HD3870X2 has only one.

Think.
Not possible?

3850 x 3 + WC hmm.. i say possibly same price as a 3870X2 to make it competitive
sg.png
Niceone
Niceone's Avatar
Registered User


Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,436
Trade rep: 0 (0%)
Niceone Mar 27th, 08, 06:54 PM #6 (permalink)
Well if they don't want any profits from this card then it is possible. HD3870 X2 is already very aggressively priced.
fi.png
nOtmeme Registered User


Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: little india
Posts: 107
Trade rep: 2 (100%)
nOtmeme Mar 27th, 08, 09:47 PM #7 (permalink)
From what i think the idea behind this card is not about how much core you can squeeze into one card but the 3 MXM slot on a PCIX16. just imagine you can upgrade the Core by plugging out the card and change to newer one.(smaller PCB, less connector etc..) this save the earth by reducing electronic waste..
Intel Pentium Dual Core E2180 @ 2.66 with TR Exterme20
4GB DDR2 800
ATI X2600 XT
Asus P5k
FSP Elpision 600w
Audigy 4
Ceative MW 500 speaker
ATI 550pro Tv tuner
sg.png
PS3-Forever Guest


Posts: n/a
Trade rep: (%)
PS3-Forever Mar 27th, 08, 10:11 PM #8 (permalink)
It will increase frame rate in Crysis from 7 fps to 13 fps on max settings.
be.png
Fatfool Registered User


Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 991
Trade rep: 4 (100%)
Fatfool Mar 28th, 08, 12:35 AM #9 (permalink)
what the hell?!

wasn't this a concept card nia? how did they get it working and benching so fast.

anyway, they really should leave out that WC solution. that TT system has been reviewed before and it sucks.

just the waterblock to connect to an existing WC system will do.
sg.png
nubie2 Registered User


Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 136
Trade rep: 0 (0%)
nubie2 Mar 28th, 08, 01:37 AM #10 (permalink)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nOtmeme View Post
From what i think the idea behind this card is not about how much core you can squeeze into one card but the 3 MXM slot on a PCIX16. just imagine you can upgrade the Core by plugging out the card and change to newer one.(smaller PCB, less connector etc..) this save the earth by reducing electronic waste..
Better yet, why can't we have the MXM slots on the motherboard , then I can put a TR-120 Extreme on it , and use HR-05's to cool the RAM.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatfool View Post
what the hell?!

wasn't this a concept card nia? how did they get it working and benching so fast.

anyway, they really should leave out that WC solution. that TT system has been reviewed before and it sucks.

just the waterblock to connect to an existing WC system will do.
They just put 3 of their laptop video cards onto a PCI-Express card. Next they need to put it on a motherboard with the core facing outward, finally no more stupid PCB at a right angle to the motherboard ruining the airflow
us.png
nOtmeme Registered User


Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: little india
Posts: 107
Trade rep: 2 (100%)
nOtmeme Mar 28th, 08, 10:32 PM #11 (permalink)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nubie2 View Post
Better yet, why can't we have the MXM slots on the motherboard , then I can put a TR-120 Extreme on it , and use HR-05's to cool the RAM.


They just put 3 of their laptop video cards onto a PCI-Express card. Next they need to put it on a motherboard with the core facing outward, finally no more stupid PCB at a right angle to the motherboard ruining the airflow
if the MXM on motherboard then u will not have space for other PCI/PCIx slot for expansion card.
Intel Pentium Dual Core E2180 @ 2.66 with TR Exterme20
4GB DDR2 800
ATI X2600 XT
Asus P5k
FSP Elpision 600w
Audigy 4
Ceative MW 500 speaker
ATI 550pro Tv tuner
sg.png
Thread Tools Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Advertisement