[newzhunter]

[TecnoWorld]

very nice still pics..what hw will be required to run them at 30+ fps? a cluster of 4 Larrabee GPUs?

[psolord]

No way dude! These pics are unreal! Especially number 4!

[power666]

Actually, most of those pictures look like they can be done under DX10 with clever shader code. Some might even be possible with DX9.

[kyouta]

looks like real sia! imagine next gen h-games ...

[wwenze]

I want moving pictures

Else, all it takes is a good artist.

[Hurricaneboi]

holy crap.

[fizzo99]

damm so fast

[Fatfool]

Originally Posted by psolord

No way dude! These pics are unreal! Especially number 4!

precisely. I find 4 is the worse one. the grass and the patch of creepers on the wall scream of flat textures.

[W.o.l.f]

I duno if its good ideal to jump DX11 soo soon even today most powerful GFX get very slow FPS in crysis and 3DMark Vantage at max settings

[chronomitch]

I don't see the images. Broken links?

[psolord]

Originally Posted by Fatfool

precisely. I find 4 is the worse one. the grass and the patch of creepers on the wall scream of flat textures.

Actually i meant that i like them very much!

The images are low res so we can't really judge the textures, but there seems to be potential!

The grass could be shader generated!

[clonez]

pic 2 looks like sims or some ugly house planner

water is most impressive

[geekylicious]

pic 1 is crazy.

[Nuker_]

Pic 1 looks like some highly advanced shaders, possibly cryengine 3 (which is due out within the timeframe 2011 probably).
pic 2 is meh, looks like some static light maps...
pic 3 is also probably pre-rendered static light maps, but they want you to believe it is radiosity rendering (that takes at least a few hours to render on a fast CPU).
pic 4 crysis looks much better except for the raytraced windows.
Overall these pics are as faked as those dx10 shots of flight sim x which we saw in 2006.