Switch to Linear ModeSwitch to Hybrid ModeSwitch to Threaded Mode
Printer Friendly View | Email this page | Register Now to start posting!
Eversor Registered User


Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 47
Trade rep: 0 (0%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
Intel iGPU smashes Nvidia, AMD Eversor Dec 21st, 09, 08:56 PM #1

The iGPU Beats both GeForce G 210 and Radeon HD 4350 performance! Nvidia's entry dedicated card just got obsolete.

Read more...


pt.png
Last edited by Eversor; Dec 22nd, 09 at 12:14 AM..
riggnix
riggnix's Avatar
Registered User


Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Gleisdorf - Styria - Austria
Posts: 530
Trade rep: 0 (0%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
riggnix Dec 21st, 09, 09:36 PM #2
omg, an intel GPU with good performance
at.png
alphadog Registered User


Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,623
Trade rep: 66 (99%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
alphadog Dec 21st, 09, 09:54 PM #3
comparing a future product with current products. take it with pinch of salt.
its easy for nvidia to terminate the current low end line and replace it with the next in line and beat intel easily.
still waiting to see intel discrete graphics
sg.png
Neo_XF
Neo_XF's Avatar
Registered User


Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 479
Trade rep: 0 (0%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
Neo_XF Dec 21st, 09, 09:55 PM #4
1920x1080... LOL...

Good for them, I guess. Even better for that market.
ro.png
hwmook
hwmook's Avatar
Mister


Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hougang
Posts: 8,924
Trade rep: 268 (100%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
hwmook Dec 22nd, 09, 12:16 AM #5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eversor View Post
The iGPU Beats both GeForce G 210 and Radeon HD 4350 performance! Nvidia's discrete laptop cards just got obsolete.

Read more...
The article seem to be wrotten by a graphics noob... bandwidth is not everything in graphics.....and that guy is comparing with a HD4xxx.....hello AMD new HD5xxx low end power savings parts are coming soon and AMD can easily throw it in and whip this future product sorry arse, i am not impressed, its barely faster than a PREVIOUS GEN product and this guy is making noise about it?
sg.png
Lightnix Registered User


Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 114
Trade rep: 0 (0%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
Lightnix Dec 22nd, 09, 12:44 AM #6
Quote:
Originally Posted by hwmook View Post
The article seem to be wrotten by a graphics noob... bandwidth is not everything in graphics.....and that guy is comparing with a HD4xxx.....hello AMD new HD5xxx low end power savings parts are coming soon and AMD can easily throw it in and whip this future product sorry arse, i am not impressed, its barely faster than a PREVIOUS GEN product and this guy is making noise about it?
In all fairness, this means it's faster than the only Nvidia 300 series cards available.
gb.png
wwenze
wwenze's Avatar
Newbie of Now and Forever


Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,034
Trade rep: 23 (100%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
wwenze Dec 22nd, 09, 01:03 AM #7
Give some credit, it managed to beat the other brands' "POS-to-sell-to-idiot-OEM-user" segment, probably with the help of the CPU handling the GPU workload.

But just as nobody buys G210 and HD4350 to play games, who would buy these. Got money for Intel latest tech no money for gfx? Pfffft. And if I don't play game any onboard gfx will suffice.
sg.png
Gollum Registered User


Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Lost Valley
Posts: 28,030
Trade rep: 21 (100%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
Gollum Dec 22nd, 09, 01:06 AM #8
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwenze View Post
Give some credit, it managed to beat the other brands' "POS-to-sell-to-idiot-OEM-user" segment, probably with the help of the CPU handling the GPU workload.

But just as nobody buys G210 and HD4350 to play games, who would buy these. Got money for Intel latest tech no money for gfx? Pfffft. And if I don't play game any onboard gfx will suffice.
the igp is the biggest market of all gfx. around 80% of all pc sales.
"Now, now, my good man, this is no time for making enemies." -- Voltaire His last words on his death bed when asked by a priest to renounce Satan.
sg.png
psolord
psolord's Avatar
Registered User


Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,301
Trade rep: 0 (0%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
psolord Dec 22nd, 09, 01:44 AM #9
Quote:
Originally Posted by hwmook View Post
The article seem to be wrotten by a graphics noob... bandwidth is not everything in graphics.....and that guy is comparing with a HD4xxx.....hello AMD new HD5xxx low end power savings parts are coming soon and AMD can easily throw it in and whip this future product sorry arse, i am not impressed, its barely faster than a PREVIOUS GEN product and this guy is making noise about it?
Agreed.

Not impressed one bit.

Any cheap 45nm cpu+ one 5670 will be a far better option, faster and cheaper!
gr.png
NerosDevil Registered User


Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 422
Trade rep: 0 (0%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
Thanked 1 Times in 1 Post
NerosDevil Dec 22nd, 09, 01:58 AM #10
Wow, this iGPU pwns <$70 cards real bad. Where can I get this iGPU at the similar price point?
my.png
Teemax Super User


Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,961
Trade rep: 28 (100%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
Teemax Dec 22nd, 09, 03:11 AM #11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gollum View Post
the igp is the biggest market of all gfx. around 80% of all pc sales.
IGP is popular alright, but it's almost free for for chipsets as well. Margin for IGP is ... marginal at best.
fr.png
haylui
haylui's Avatar
Registered User


Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,932
Trade rep: 12 (100%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
haylui Dec 22nd, 09, 06:52 AM #12
AMD just need to integrate HD4650 into their north bridge to beat Intel, again
my rig: it isn't an oil rig. how i wish it was.
sg.png
wwenze
wwenze's Avatar
Newbie of Now and Forever


Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,034
Trade rep: 23 (100%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
wwenze Dec 22nd, 09, 08:45 AM #13
If anyone wants to do it they can stuff a GTX260 onboard too.

But it's pointless if nobody cares about the performance. Yes this Intel IGP is faster than others, and IGP is a big market, but the slowest Intel GMA series has been dominating it.

With this new iGPU, Intel will still be the market leader, but that'd be nothing to do with the performance. On Intel's side, it probably saves system cost.
sg.png
power666 Registered User


Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,053
Trade rep: 0 (0%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
power666 Dec 22nd, 09, 01:47 PM #14
Bleh. The article has many, many, many things wrong. First off, the 8 GB/sec link the article is referring to is apparently the PCI-E bus. The PCI-E bus has enough bandwidth between the video card and chipset to not be a bottleneck for a single high end card. The amusing thing here is that the Radeon 4350 and Geforce G 210 likely have less than 8 GB/sec of bandwidth here: they have 64 bit wide memory buses to their own dedicated memory and cards typical use desktop DDR2 or DDR3 memory. Secondly, that 25.6 GB/sec of memory bandwidth has to be shared between the CPU and GPU functions. Thirdly, the 1920 x 1080 tests does stress memory bandwidth. Those nVidia and AMD cards still have a chance of out running the new Intel GPU at lower resolutions, say 1680 x 1050 or 1280 x 1024 where memory bandwidth is not such a critical issue.
us.png
LiM Registered User


Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,480
Trade rep: 4 (100%)
Infractions: 0/0 (0)
LiM Dec 22nd, 09, 02:09 PM #15
Quote:
Originally Posted by haylui View Post
AMD just need to integrate HD4650 into their north bridge to beat Intel, again
They integrate a 480 stream processors gpu into the cpu, codename Llano, although not available soon, 2011 actually.
sg.png
New Thread | ↑↓ Similar Threads
Similar Threads Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Paschen News around the web! 2 Jul 2nd, 08
08:05 AM
KonKorT News around the web! 6 Jun 9th, 08
01:07 AM
newzhunter News around the web! 8 Apr 18th, 08
09:41 PM
newzhunter News around the web! 1 Jun 18th, 07
05:05 PM
booest Hardware Depot 23 Oct 6th, 06
05:50 PM
Thread Tools Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode